

Traditional steel strapping causes thousands of workplace injuries annually from sharp edges and recoil accidents while adding unnecessary freight weight and corrosion damage to shipments. Cord strap systems eliminate these problems while costing less per meter, weighing five times less than equivalent steel, and delivering consistent system strength from 480 kg to 2,600 kg. A major Australian retail chain eliminated all steel strapping across its supply chain after multiple serious cutting injuries, proving composite alternatives provide equal or superior security at lower total cost. This article compares upfront and lifecycle costs, quantifies safety improvements and handling efficiency gains, and demonstrates why cord strap systems outperform steel strapping, wire rope, and chain securing methods across most industrial applications.
A 19mm composite cord strap coil weighs 10 kg per 500 meters versus 15 kg for 180 meters of equivalent steel—making composite five times lighter per linear meter. This weight difference compounds across shipments. Operations securing 1,000 pallets monthly with four straps each save 200+ kg in packaging weight alone.
Freight charges are calculated by total shipment weight, so lighter strapping directly reduces per-load costs. The savings multiply for export shipping where ocean and air freight prices tie to dimensional weight calculations. Composite strapping’s reduced bulk allows more product per container, improving cargo density and lowering cost per unit shipped.
Handling efficiency improves with lightweight materials. Workers move composite coils easily without equipment, while steel coils require two-person lifts or material handling tools. This ergonomic advantage reduces labor time and physical strain during strapping operations.
Steel strapping recoils violently when cut under tension, causing lacerations, eye injuries, and other serious wounds that steel’s sharp edges inflict. The Australian retail case study specifically cited multiple serious injuries from cutting steel straps as the primary driver for supply chain-wide elimination. Composite cord straps eliminate recoil risk entirely—when cut, they fall safely without dangerous snap-back.
The soft polyester construction creates no sharp edges during handling, cutting, or disposal. Workers don’t need cut-resistant gloves or face shields required for steel strapping applications. This safety improvement reduces workers’ compensation claims, lost work days, and liability exposure.
Equipment costs drop when composite systems replace steel. Steel requires expensive pneumatic tensioners, sealers, and protective gear. Composite cord straps work with single low-cost manual, battery, or pneumatic tools that tension, secure, and cut in simplified operations. Tool maintenance expenses decrease because composite materials don’t generate metal shavings that jam equipment.
Composite cord straps resist rust, rot, and chemical degradation that destroys steel strapping in maritime, outdoor, and industrial environments. Steel corrodes from moisture exposure, leaving rust stains on products and weakening the strap over weeks or months. Composite maintains full strength from -30°C to 140°C without degradation.
The polyester construction withstands weathering, UV exposure, and chemical contact that steel can’t handle. This resistance proves critical for bundled goods in outdoor storage yards, cargo crossing multiple climate zones, or products exposed to industrial chemicals during processing.
Retensioning capability extends composite strap lifespan beyond single use. Timber bundles shrink as wood dries, concrete settling occurs during curing, and loads compact during multi-stop deliveries—composite straps accommodate these changes through retensioning at delivery points. Steel crimps and seals don’t allow adjustment once applied.
Wire buckles paired with composite cord straps deliver consistent system strength regardless of operator skill or tool variation. Steel crimps depend heavily on crimping tool quality, operator technique, and sealer calibration—producing unreliable joint strength that varies package to package. This consistency matters for compliance documentation and cargo insurance requirements.
The buckle joint provides mechanical grip that maintains tension under vibration, temperature shifts, and load movement. Steel crimps can open gradually under stress, allowing dangerous slack that compromises load security. Testing shows composite systems retain tension better over extended shipping periods.
System strength ranges from 480 kg to 2,600 kg across available widths from 13mm to 32mm, matching or exceeding steel strapping capacity in equivalent sizes. The composite construction delivers this strength at a fraction of steel’s weight, combining security with efficiency.
Steel strapping’s rigid structure and abrasive edges damage product surfaces, corrugate packaging, and dent metal goods during application and transport. The sharp edges cut into soft materials like timber, plastics, and textiles. Composite straps’ soft texture conforms to irregular shapes without marking or abrading cargo.
This gentle contact reduces or eliminates protective edge guards, corner protectors, and additional packaging materials needed to prevent steel strap damage. The packaging cost savings add to overall system economy while simplifying application procedures.
Rust staining from steel creates costly product damage claims, particularly for finished goods, white goods, and products requiring clean appearance at delivery. Composite straps never rust, eliminating this damage category entirely.
Single-tool composite systems complete tensioning, buckling, and cutting in streamlined steps versus steel’s multiple tool requirements. Operators achieve faster per-package times while maintaining superior joint quality. High-volume operations report 30-40% time reductions per secured load.
Composite cord strap application requires minimal training compared to steel’s complex tensioning, crimping, and cutting procedures. New operators reach competency in hours rather than days, reducing training costs and onboarding time. The simplified process also reduces application errors that compromise load security.
Composite coils stack efficiently in smaller spaces than bulky steel coils. The lightweight construction allows vertical storage without heavy-duty racking systems. Material handling becomes one-person operations instead of requiring equipment or multiple workers.
Upfront per-meter pricing shows composite often costs more than steel. However, total cost of ownership calculations reveal composite’s advantages across multiple factors:
Operations comparing cost per secured load rather than cost per meter discover composite delivers 20-35% savings versus steel across annual volumes. The savings increase for export applications where weight reduction and corrosion resistance provide maximum benefit.
Composite polyester construction supports recycling and responsible disposal. Steel strapping generates scrap metal requiring collection, sorting, and processing infrastructure. Composite materials integrate into standard plastic recycling streams or incinerate cleanly without heavy metal contamination.
Reduced packaging weight lowers fuel consumption across supply chains. The five-times lighter composite straps decrease diesel and jet fuel usage proportionally to weight savings. This carbon footprint reduction matters for companies tracking sustainability metrics.
Longer service life from corrosion resistance means fewer replacements and less waste generation. The retensioning capability extends single-strap usage across multiple applications before disposal.
Composite systems rated 1,400-2,600 kg handle steel products, industrial equipment, and construction machinery previously secured with wire rope or heavy steel strapping. One operation increased container output 330% while reducing costs 50% by switching from steel to composite for coil securing.
Wood bundles shrink during drying, dimensional lumber stacks, and construction materials benefit from retensionable composite that adjusts as loads settle. The non-abrasive surface prevents edge damage to finished lumber.
Maritime shipping’s saltwater exposure, temperature extremes, and multi-week transit times favor corrosion-proof composite over steel that rusts during voyage. The shock absorption protects cargo from vessel motion and rough handling at ports.
Composite straps resist acids, bases, and solvents that corrode steel within days. Drums, barrels, and processed materials requiring chemical-resistant securing use composite exclusively.
Is composite cord strap actually stronger than steel?
Composite cord strap is stronger than steel when compared size-for-size. A 19mm composite system achieves equivalent or superior strength to 19mm steel strapping while weighing five times less per meter. System strength ranges from 480 kg to 2,600 kg across available widths, matching or exceeding steel capacity.
What’s the real cost difference between steel and composite strapping?
While composite costs more per meter upfront, total cost of ownership runs 20-35% lower when accounting for freight savings, reduced tool expenses, eliminated injury costs, and decreased product damage claims. Operations measuring cost per secured load rather than material cost discover composite delivers superior economy.
Can composite straps handle heavy industrial loads that currently use steel?
Yes. Composite systems rated up to 2,600 kg system strength secure steel coils, heavy machinery, and construction equipment previously requiring steel strapping or wire rope. One facility increased container output 330% while cutting costs 50% by switching to composite for heavy coil securing.
How does composite perform in extreme weather or chemical environments?
Composite maintains full strength from -30°C to 140°C without degradation. The polyester construction resists rust, rot, chemicals, UV exposure, and moisture that destroys steel. This durability proves essential for maritime shipping, outdoor storage, and industrial applications involving chemical exposure.
What makes composite safer than traditional steel strapping?
Composite eliminates the sharp edges and violent recoil that cause serious cutting and eye injuries with steel. When cut under tension, composite falls safely instead of snapping back. A major retail chain eliminated all steel strapping supply-chain-wide after multiple serious injuries, switching entirely to composite alternatives.
Composite cord strap systems deliver 20-35% lower total cost of ownership versus steel while eliminating serious injury risks and weighing five times less per linear meter. System strength from 480 kg to 2,600 kg matches or exceeds steel capacity across equivalent sizes, with superior corrosion resistance, retensioning capability, and consistent joint performance. Major operations report 330% output increases and 50% cost reductions after switching from steel to composite for heavy load securing.
Request a cost-benefit analysis comparing your current securing methods against composite cord strap systems.
Amass Strap manufactures complete composite cord strap systems engineered for safety, performance, and cost efficiency. Our product range includes 13mm through 32mm widths with system strengths from 480 kg to 2,600 kg, paired with galvanized wire buckles providing consistent joint strength regardless of operator technique. We supply low-maintenance tensioning tools suitable for manual, battery, or pneumatic operation, delivering simplified application procedures that reduce training time and eliminate the multi-tool complexity of steel strapping systems. All products resist corrosion from -30°C to 140°C, support retensioning for settling loads, and weigh five times less than equivalent steel for reduced freight charges.
Visit amass-strap.com to download our total cost of ownership calculator comparing steel versus composite expenses across your specific application volume, request sample systems for side-by-side testing against your current securing methods, or schedule an operational assessment where our engineers analyze your strapping processes, measure actual costs including freight, labor, damage claims, and injury expenses, then provide documented cost-benefit projections showing potential savings from transitioning to composite cord strap cargo securing solutions to securing solutions.